US, San Francisco

Controversies Data Set

ESG Controversies Uncovered

IdealRatings’ ESG Controversies Data Set provides an advanced, comprehensive evaluation of companies' exposure to ESG-related controversies and their corresponding management strategies. This solution is designed to assess and quantify the impact and mitigation efforts related to legal proceedings involving environmental, social, and governance violations.

Methodology

IdealRatings Controversies Assessment methodology involves two key components:

1. Impact Evaluation Assessment: Understanding a controversy’s level of damage based on its type, penalty amount, and frequency of recurrence.

2. Violation Management Performance: Analyzes company’s risk mitigation strategies, including policies, programs, and corrective actions

ESG Controversies Categories

Environmental Violations
Social Violations
Governance Violations
By combining these components, IdealRatings can rank the cases on a scale of Severe, High, Medium, and low. This is conducted KPI, pillar, and overall company levels.
IdealRatings ESG Controversy Severity Grading Scale
Severe
0- 25%
High
25-less than 50%
Medium
50-less than 75%
Low
75 100%
Benefits

Legal Risk Mitigation

Evaluate companies' involvement in ESG controversies to identify and address risks.

Severity Tracking

Categorize controversies based on severity levels to prioritize high-risk areas.

Transparent Reporting

Include controversy analysis in ESG disclosures for enhanced stakeholder trust.

WP Site Test
Privacy Overview

We use cookies to enhance your experience and analyze our website’s performance. We never sell your personal information.

You have the right to manage your data and cookie preferences at any time.

By continuing to use our website, you agree to our use of cookies and other data practices as outlined in our Privacy Policy.